Showing posts with label Steuben. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steuben. Show all posts

Thursday, August 20, 2020

260th Anniversary of the Battle of Strehla (Gefecht bei Oschatz)


View from the Dürrenberg to the southeast, where the vast majority of the
Reichsarmee remained as a fixing force.

Today is the 260th anniversary of the Battle of Strehla (Gefect bei Oschatz), during the Seven Years War in German Central Europe. A small battle by the standards of the European Seven Years War, with perhaps just under 40,000 men on the battlefield, it is larger than any of the battles of the American War of Independence. Fought in the electorate of Saxony, allied forces attempted to use their large numerical superiority to force the occupying Prussian army to abandon a good defensive position on the river Elbe. I had the good fortune to be able to walk this battlefield in 2018, in the summer just a few weeks before the battle's anniversary.

A (not breath-takingly accuarte) period map of Strehla
In this battle, the 67 year-old Prussian Lt. General, Johann Dietrich von Hülsen was attacked by an Austrian and Reichsarmee force under the command of Karl Friedrich Graf von Pfalz Zweibrücken-Birkenfeld.[1] At this battle, the allied Austrians and Reichsarmee numbered between 25,000 to 30,000 men, and faced a Prussian Army of 10,000 to 12,000 men.[2]

Hülsen deployed his soldiers on two sets of rising ground near the small town of Strehla, with his main army in a defensive camp by the town, and a detached force of grenadiers and artillery further west from the river on the high ground north of the village of Clanzschwitz. In this battle, the Austrians would ignore Hülsen's main camp, and focus their efforts on the relatively isolated grenadiers.

The view from Prussian positions at the Dürrenberg, towards Gausco's Austrian
Grenadiers. The village of Clanzschwitz is in shadow

Attempting an attack by multiple columns, the allies surrounded Hülsen's isolated advanced post at the Dürrenberg, where Major General Braun stood with 4-5 battalions of Prussian Grenadiers. Tying up the Austrian Grenadiers from the south with an artillery duel, Braun shifted his forces move towards a large hill with a windmill to the west, just as FML. Kleefeld's detachment of five battalions broke out of woods directly to Braun's north. Shifting his battalions to meet this more immediate threat, Braun benefited from the relative inactivity of Austrian forces to his west and south, who continued to engage his forces in an artillery duel, but did not launch heavy attacks. FML Kreefeld's force engaged the Prussian grenadiers in a close range firefight.

Looking north from the Dürrenberg, to where the Austrians under Kleefeld would
have emerged. 
At this point, Hülsen, realizing the danger, immediately moved the Schorlemer Dragoons across the battlefield, riding between the dueling Austrian and Prussian artillery, to attack the flank of Kleefeld's corps. Eventually, these troops were bailed out by Austrian cuirassier, but not before the dragoons had broken up the attack, with the support of the grenadiers already engaged. The battle ended with a cavalry fight on the north end of the battlefield above the village of Laas, where Colonel Kleist, having redeployed to face a large body of allied cavalry, pushed these forces back, ending the battle. 


A view of the northern cavalry battlefield on the flat ground northwest of the
village of Laas
In a sharp fight lasting only two hours, the Prussians had defeated an enemy force that outnumbered them over two to one. The Prussians suffered approximately 1,000 killed and wounded, the allies suffered 1,800 killed and wounded, and 1,200 prisoners lost to the Prussians.[3] Realizing that discretion was the better part of valor, Hülsen withdrew to the stronger defensive position at Torgau the same day, delaying the allied advance for a month from that position.

The battle shows fighting typical of the middle stages of the Seven Years War. The Austrians, impressed by their success at Hochkirch, continue to employ the  method of moving independent columns to partially surround the enemy before attacking. Likewise, Austrian and higher quality Reichsarmee troops are used for actual combat operations, while the majority of the Reichsarmee is used to fix the enemy in place. In the actual battle, the difficulties in coordinating simultaneous independent assaults because evident, as the Prussians manage to fix enemy columns in place with long-range artillery duels. All in all, Hülsen, Braun, and Kleist performed quite well in the face of superior enemy forces.

If you enjoyed this post, or any of our other posts, please consider liking us on facebook, or following us on twitter. Consider checking out our exclusive content on Patreon. Finally, we are dedicated to keeping Kabinettskriege ad-free. In order to assist with this, please consider supporting us via the donate button in the upper right-hand corner of the page. As always:

Thanks for Reading, 



Alex Burns

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] As a complete aside, Friedrich Wilhelm, Freiherr de Steuben (Baron Steuben), likely fought at this battle as a member of Hülsen's staff. Palmer, General von Steuben, 38.
[2] Christopher Duffy, By Force of Arms, 273.
[3] German General Staff, Die Kriege Friedrichs des Großen. Theil 3, Der Siebenjährige Krieg, 1756-1763 Bd. 13, pg. 178.

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

"Plan for the Cloathing of the [Continental] Infantry" by Freiherr de Steuben


Dear Reader,

Today, I am sharing a primary source regarding clothing in the American Continental Army. This is a proposed plan created by Friedrich Wilhelm, Freiherr de Steuben, for clothing the infantrymen of the Continental Army.  Obviously, this plan was never fully adopted by the United States, and shortages continued throughout the war. This plan, however, gives a clear vision for the type of clothing which Continental troops could expect to receive, and also Steuben's view of what the ideal clothing of a soldier consisted of.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newburgh, August 14th, 1779

Gentlemen,

...The distribution of cloathing should be made with more regularity. As long as [one] regiment receives shirts, whilst another receives shoes and their stockings, or what is still worse, when a regiment receives 20 hats, another 200, and another none at all, we must not think of having our Army cloathed.

The distribution of cloathing should be made at certain fixed periods in the year.

Whatever the soldier is to receive should be determined. Every article of the cloathing should be valued at a certain rate, he who receives more than his allowed should refund the price of the surplus and he who receives less should have an adequate compensation made to him.

The annexed plan of such an arrangement will make it clear and more sensible to you, and although at first sight it may appear so much an expenditure, yet I dare assert it will prove advantageous and oeconomical to the United States.


Plan
for the Cloathing of the Infantry

Whatever Cloathing the soldiers receive from the states may be reduced to these Heads:

1st. The Necessaries

2nd. The Uniform

3rd. The Small Mounting 

The necessaries of a soldier consist of:

A haversack of calf or goat skin
A Knapsack of Grey linen
A Blanket
A Pair of shoe buckles
A Pair of Knee Ditto
A Stock Ditto
A Clothes Brush
A Pair of Shoe Brushes
A Large Comb                   I  
A Small Tooth Ditto            I
Six needles                        I    [These] Enclosed
Two Oz Blue thread           I > in a leather case
Two Oz White Ditto            I
A Pocket Knife                   I
A Tin Spoon                       I

The Uniform of a Soldier Consists of: 

A Hat
A Pair of Wool Overalls
A Coat
A Leather Stock
A Waistcoat
A Pair of Garters and Buckles
A Pair of Wooll Breeches
A Pair of Woollen Gloves

The Small Mounting Consists of:

Two Shirts                                      I          Once of each Articles
Two Pair Woollen Stockings          I  >       Every Four Months 
A Pair of Shoes                              I

x A Queue Ribbon and One every six months

A Hunting Shirt                            I
A Pair Wool Overalls                   I> Per Year 

The soldiers should receive their necessaries at their first entering in the Regiment
They should receive their Uniform every New Years Day 
Their small mounting should be made at four different parts of the year:

1st Delivery/ Jan 1st
A  shirt, a pair stockings, a par of shoes, a queue ribbon
2nd Delivery/ April 1st
A shirt, a pair of Lin. Overalls, a pair of shoes
3rd Delivery/ June 1st
A Hunting Shirt, A pair of overalls a Queue Ribbon
4th Delivery/ Sept 1st
A shirt, a pair stockings, a pair of shoes 

The soldiers' necessaries always belong to the states, and when a soldier leaves the service
he must be accountable for them to the Regimental paymaster.

The Uniform belongs to the soldier after sixteen months service and when a soldier dies or quits the Regiment before the expiration of that time his uniform must be must be delivered to the paymaster
who will keep it in his store to distribute its  to the soldiers who will arrive in the course of the year.

The small mounting belong to the soldier after four months service, in case of Death or Discharge, but as long as he remains with the Regiment he must account at each review for the following articles:

3 shirts 3 pair stockings 1 pair of shoes 1 hunting shirt
1 pair linen overalls when a recruit enters a regiment from
January to April, inclusive he receives:
His necessaries
His Uniform new and Compleat
2 shirts
2 pair of stockings
1 pair shoes
1 Queue Ribbons

When a recruit enters his Regt from
May to Aug inclusive he receives
His necessaries
A complete Uniform from those in the paymasters' stores
2 shirts
2 pairs of stockings
1 pair of shoes
1 Queue Ribbon

A recruit who enters from September to Jan inclusive receives

His necessaries
A Complete Uniform from the paymaster's [stores]
2 shirts
2 pairs of stockings
1 Pair of shoes
1 Queue Ribbon

Steuben /////
Maj. General[1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this post, or any of our other posts, please consider liking us on facebook, or following us on twitter. Finally, we are dedicated to keeping Kabinettskriege ad-free. In order to assist with this, please consider supporting us via the donate button in the upper right-hand corner of the page. As always: 


Thanks for Reading,



Alex Burns




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steuben Papers, 2:10. 

Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Was General Friedrich Wilhelm de Steuben Openly Gay?

Charles Wilson Peale's portrait of Steuben[1]
Dear Reader,


Today, we are going to carefully address a topic related to American and Prussian military history, and the history of the LGTBQ+ community in the United States. It important to note, at the outset, that topics dealing with the history of the LGTBQ+ community are politically charged, and that it is often difficult to speak on these topics without saying anything controversial. I hope, in my post today, to treat this topic with the humility, care, and respect it deserves. This post seeks to address the following questions, using the best sources available: 1) Is it possible that Steuben was homosexual? 2) Is it possible that Steuben was heterosexual? 3) Is there any evidence to support the contemporary charges that Steuben was a pedophile? 4) Did Steuben hold the first underwear party in American history, at Valley Forge? 5) Did Steuben leave his property to North, Walker, and Mulligan because they were lovers?

Since 2011, author and journalist Mark Segal has written a number of pieces regarding Steuben and his place in American history as a gay man. You can see an interview with Segal here. One of Segal's articles (most of them run along similar lines) can be found here. There are numerous posts on news sites and which explore this idea. At first glance, an examination of the documentary record confirms this view. In the early days of 1780, Steuben wrote to his young "friend" Benjamin Walker, stating, "I expect you with the impatience of a lover for his mistress..."[2] It would seem, then, that there is some evidence that Steuben lived his life as a gay man.  However, Steuben continues his letter: "... or to speak without figures, all the sentiments of true friendship."[3] This ambiguity is often lost in writings which argue that Steuben lived his life as an openly gay man.

For more on Steuben's life, and a brief discussion of his sexuality, check out Dr. Paul Lockhart's excellent book, The Drillmaster of Valley Forge. Lockhart explores the whole course of Steuben's life in a way which it is impossible to do here on this blog. The only chapter length treatment on the subject of Steuben, North, and Walker's sexuality is William Beneman's Male-Male Intimacy in Early America, and though Benemann comes to slightly different conclusions than I do here, I still highly recommend it.

1) Is it possible that Steuben was homosexual? 

In the course of his service in the Prussian Army during the Seven Years War, Steuben became familiar with Frederick II ("the Great") of Prussia, who was likely gay, and his brother, Prince Henry of Prussia, who was almost certainly gay. Both members of this Prussian Royal Family were unhappily married, neither had children, and Prince Henry had a series of famous male lovers. Thus, in the course of his service with the Prussian Army, it is highly likely that Steuben experienced (and possibly an active part in) a queer subculture which was present at its highest echelons.

In 1777, Steuben was extremely interested in service with the American Continental Army as a result of his dismissal from the court of Hohenzollern-Hechingen. He was dismissed from his position at this small German court as a result of accusations that "taken familiarities with young boys which the laws forbid and punish severely."[4] This is not a reference to homosexual relations between consenting adults, which was also punishable, but instead a charge of pedophilia.[5] Obviously, this charge of pedophilia does not mean that Steuben is gay or straight. However, the fact that there were some at the court of Hohenzollern-Hechingen who believed that he was interested in young boys rather than women may have some bearing on his sexuality. As I will discuss below using archival evidence, I think these accusations are baseless, and that Steuben was not a pedophile.

Upon his arrival in North America, Steuben formed close and potentially sexual relationships with many men, including Peter Stephen Duponceau and John W. Mulligan, his secretaries, Benjamin Walker and William North, his aides, and Charles Adams, John Adam's son. These men lived with Steuben, and he left his worldy goods and property to some of them upon his death: Mulligan, North, Walker. One modern writer has referred to Steuben's retirement in upstate New York as an "ephibic Eden."[6]

Most of the evidence for Steuben's homosexuality comes out of the extremely emotional and occasionally erotic language which Steuben used in correspondence with his two best friends in North America: Benjamin Walker, and William North. As with the reference above, much of this erotic language can be ascribed to the neo-classical nature of eighteenth-century letter writing and male friendships, but it is also very possible that these relationships were sexual in nature.

2) Is it possible that Steuben was heterosexual? 

Mark Segal argues that the only shred of evidence which points to the idea that Steuben formed romantic relationships with women is an unsourced anecdote from Friedrich Kapp's biography of Steuben, in which Steuben had a miniature portrait of a beautiful woman, and was touchy when asked about it.[7] He also playfully noted in a letter to an officer before the Seven Years War, "I am more gallant with the ladies than my master [Frederick II]."[8] Correspondence indicates that Steuben gave French Brigadier Hahn permission to set him up with a daughter of a friend, but nothing came of the match.[9] 

Steuben was clearly familiar with standards of female beauty, and was not shy about telling his friends (even friends who were often said to be gay) that beautiful women were present. In the same letter to Benjamin Walker quoted above, as an incentive for a reason to come and visit him, Steuben tells Walker, "You will find there a young widow, and a lady from New York with a beautiful waist, a reason the more for you to hasten your departure."[10] This seems to indicate that at least on some level, Steuben was aware that Walker possessed a sexual interest in young women, and even took it upon himself to further Walker's interests.

In a letter to Steuben in December of 1783, Walker notes, "I have been obliged to learn backgammon, of which I am equally tired. In fact I have only one resource left to prevent my dying of ennui, to seek some neighbors' daughters, pour passer le temps. You know, my dear general, how much this is against my conscience, and will judge how hard I must be driven before I could bring myself to seek this expedient to amuse myself."[11] Walker's statement could be read two ways: one which indicates that he is against seducing young women because he believes it is morally wrong, the other that women were not his preference or first sexual choice. However, if Steuben was gay and in a partnership with Walker, it would seem odd that he both attempted to suggest that Walker should visit him as a result of the beautiful women, and that Walker would feel comfortable with expressing his desire to "pass the time" with local women.

Steuben's aides also reported that he was not afraid to flirt. North reported to his fellow officer James Thatcher, 
In the company of ladies, the baron always appeared to peculiar advantage . At the house of the respectable Mrs . Livingston, mother of the late Chancellor , where virtue , talent , and modest worth of every kind met a welcome reception , the baron was introduced to a Miss Sheaf , an amiable and interesting young lady. “ I am very happy , " said he , "in the honor of being presented to you , mademoiselle , though I see it is at an infinite risk ; I have from my youth been cautioned to guard myself against mischief , but I had no idea that her attractions were so powerful.[12]
North himself wrote letters to Walker, indicating a (possibly romantic) love for both Steuben and Walker, and also that he objectified women. He summed up his feeling's on George Washington's niece with the statement, "she has no breasts, Ben!" Likewise, he expressed disbelief that he had not sexual assaulted enslaved women in the south, noting with obvious sarcasm, "Will you believe it-- I have not humped a single mulatto since I am down here."[13] Though the second piece of evidence is horrifying, both point to the idea that North both had and sometimes acted on sexual impulses related to women.

Steuben's first secretary, Pierre-Étienne du Ponceau, is often framed as Steuben's sexual companion or plaything during his trip to North America, with one publication calling him "his pretty young French secretary."[14]

That same secretary, gives this description of Steuben's passage through Lancaster on his way to Valley Forge:
"we passed through Lancaster, then considered the largest inland town in the United States. Having arrived there early in the afternoon, the baron was waited upon by Colonel Gibson and other gentlemen, who invited him and his family to a subscription ball to take place that evening, in honor of his arrival. The baron accepted, and we accordingly went. There we saw assembled all the fashion and beauty of Lancaster and its vicinity. The baron was delighted to converse with the German girls in his native tongue. There was a handsome supper, and the company did not separate until two o'clock the next morning."[15]
Duponceau himself seemed rather attached to young women, he made and kept a pledge to kiss the first girl he met in America, and was incredibly infatuated with Sally Duane, the sixteen year-old daughter of his (and Steuben's) Landlady. Duponceau himself was only seventeen, and his notebook was filled Sally's name written in a number of different scripts.[16] In the same notebook, poems mention Sally's name quite frequently.[17] If Duponceau and Steuben possessed a romantic relationship, it was not an exclusive one, and Duponcaeu clearly held feelings for women, and noted that Steuben was "delighted" to speak with them. Duponceau also notes that he felt duty bound, as Steuben's interpreter, to translate Steuben's flirtations with his landlady and the young women in Boston, but that he left the other young men of Steuben's suite to fend for themselves when it came to flirting, taking advantage of his familiarity with the English language in order to flirt with young women. [18] Steuben valued his friendship with this family of three women (Mrs. Duane, a British officer's widow, and her two daughters), that he made a special trip to see them in 1786.[19]

 None of the correspondence from the Adams family between late 1792 and early 1795 indicates that John Adams thought of Steuben as anything other than a good friend and mentor to his son. Upon receiving news of Steuben's death, John Adams wrote to his son, Charles, stating, "The Papers announce to Us the Death of our Friend the Baron, whom I Sincerely lament. The Importance of his services to this Country were not known to every One so well as to me."[20] If John Adams did not like Steuben, as the theory that Steuben facilitated Charles' gay lifestyle suggests, why are Adam's letters to Charles about Steuben so glowing? The most telling is perhaps John Adams writing to Abigail Adams in December of 1794, "I am afraid that Charles will lose his friend Steuben", in reference to reports that Steuben had suffered a stroke.[21]

What about Steuben himself? Steuben paid wages to an African American woman connect to either himself or Colonel Walker. Steuben had one African American servant, a free man named Nathan Fry, but this woman is not listed in either of his surviving wills. Is it possible that he or Benjamin Walker had an illegitimate child with this woman?[22]  Steuben seems to have caused some controversy while at the court of Peter III in Russia, during his stay as a guest of Catherine the Great. It is currently unclear what the exact nature of this scandal was. In addition, Steuben himself formed a close attachment to his friend and patron, Friedericke Dorothea, the wife of the future Duke of Wuerttemberg. It is possible that she was the woman in Steuben's miniature portrait, but this is purely speculation. In the same way that there is not clear evidence to suggest physical intimacy with many of his male friends, sources are lacking here.

All of Steuben's potential American male lovers (Adams, Duponceau, Mulligan, Walker, and North) married and had children, most of them during his life time. Some had sexual relations with women before marriage, or implied that they did in private correspondence. Of course, this is not direct evidence that Steuben and these men did not have sexual relationships, simply that these men were capable of also existing in the hetero-normative culture of their time.  Steuben's sexuality was likely not as clear cut (gay/straight) as modern advocates claim.

3) Is there any evidence to support the contemporary charges that Steuben was a pedophile? 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, modern advocates for Steuben's homosexuality are relatively silent on the contemporary charge (made in 1777) that he had committed pedophilia. (Again, the exact wording of the charge is that Steuben "taken familiarities with young boys which the laws forbid and punish severely.") This fits less well with the overall understanding that Steuben was an openly gay founding father of the United States, and should be treated as an LGTBQ+ hero. Fortunately, the evidence against Steuben is very slight, and I can particularly add to this part of the conversation based upon my research.'

The only reference to this charge comes from an indignant letter sent by a supporter of Steuben to his former employer, Prinz Josef of Hohenzollern-Hechingen. Steuben fled from the court of Hohenzollern-Hechingen after this charge was brought against him, but within three years, Steuben's former friend Hoevel, still at court, reached out to him to ensure Steuben of his continued friendship. Likewise, after five years, Prinz Josef of Hohenzollern-Hechingen wrote to assure Steuben that both he and his wife had only ever thought the best of Steuben, and that he had their continued friendship.[23] To my mind, considering the extreme nature of the charges against Steuben (trans and gay people were sometimes exiled or put to death in the eighteenth century) it seems unlikely that these letters would have been written if Steuben had been seriously suspected of these crimes. Thus, aside from the accusation, there is no evidence to support the claim that Steuben was a pedophile, and indeed, there is evidence to suggest that those present at the time did not take the charge very seriously.

4) Did Steuben hold the first underwear party in American Military History?

The evidence for this comes from a social gathering held by Steuben in April of 1778. Supposedly, Steuben insisted that nobody who attended this party could wear a whole pair of breeches. His secretary, Duponceau gives us the whole story:
We who lived in good quarters did not feel the misery of the times so much as the common soldiers and the subaltern officers... Once with the Baron's permission, his aides invited a number of young officers to diner at our quarters, on the condition that none should be admitted that had on a whole pair of breeches. This was understood of course, as pars pro toto, but torn clothes were an indispensable requisite for admission and in this the guests were not sure to fail.[24] 
On closer examination, then, it appears that this was a effort to show solidarity with the suffering soldiers at Valley Forge, rather than effort to hold an explicitly erotic gathering. Duponceau continued, "The Baron loved to speak of that dinner, and of his sans culottes, as he called us."[25] Duponceau then claims that Steuben invented this term before it was used in Paris during the French Revolution, which, of course, is not quite correct. In calling the gathered men, sans culottes, Steuben was invoking a phrase common to Parisian salons in the 1770s, which referred to a young genius (usually a writer) without a patron.[26] Once again, a careful analysis of this event seems to point to the idea that it was based upon class solidarity, not sensual delight.


5) Did Steuben leave his property and wealth to his male lovers?

In his will, Steuben left his money and property to William North, Benjamin Walker, and John Mulligan. and this is often cited as evidence of the potential romantic nature of their relationship. While this may indeed be the case, Steuben had previously planned to leave his estate to his nephew, Friedrich Wilhelm von Canitz. His second will, made in the year 1781, makes it clear that he still expects to leave his property to his family.[27]

Unfortunately for Canitz and Steuben, the two had a falling out after both of Steuben's nephews visited the old general in North America in the year 1786. On their way back to Europe, the two young men spent heavily, stopped for a costly vacation in Norway, and expected Steuben to pay the cost. He was extremely offended, and when they offered to come see him again, he threatened to put them both in debtors prison should they return to America. Steuben wrote to Canitz in January of 1789, informing him of the breaking of familial ties, and that he never wished to see Canitz again.[28] Needless to say, this somewhat soured Steuben's relationship with his European family, and as a result of not have any North American relatives, Steuben decided to leave his property to North, Walker, and Mulligan. Of course, this does not mean that Steuben did not have a sexual relationship with North, Walker, or Mulligan, simply that he had other reasons to leave them his worldly possessions.

Final Thoughts

There is plenty of room for Steuben to be a hero for many diverse groups. It is possible that he was asexual, as there is no clear evidence that he engaged in sexual relationships with anyone throughout his life. It is also possible that he was heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual. The simple fact is that there is not clear evidence to definitively understand Steuben's sexual preferences. Steuben's life was complex, and he should be claimed by citizens of the United States, not just as a result of his sexual preferences, but as a fascinating man in his own right. Steuben may have been gay, but the moral standards of the time dictated that he could never have been openly gay. In the end, Steuben's sexuality remains obscure. 

If you enjoyed this post, or any of our other posts, please consider liking us on facebook, or following us on twitter. Finally, we are dedicated to keeping Kabinettskriege ad-free. In order to assist with this, please consider supporting us via the donate button in the upper right-hand corner of the page. As always: 


Thanks for Reading,



Alex Burns



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Apparently, Steuben hated this picture of himself. Kapp, Life of Steuben, 620.
[2] Kapp, Life of Steuben, 617.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Quoted in Palmer, General von Steuben, 92.
[5] For an examination of an eighteenth-century German military figure who was prosecuted for having homosexual relations with his fellow soldiers, see Alexander Burns, "Honor, Religion and Reputation: The Worldview of the German Subsidentruppen who fought in the American War of Independence", Master Thesis presented to Ball State University, Chapter 4.
[6] https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/secret-gay-history-hamilton-4th-july/
[7] Kapp, Life of Steuben, 641.
[8] Kapp, Life of Steuben, 617.
[9]Quoted in Palmer, General von Steuben, 32.
[10] Quoted in Palmer, General von Steuben, 77.
[11] Kapp, Life of Steuben, 619.
[12] James Thatcher, Military Journal, 432. 
[13] The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, Simon Gratz Collection (#250), Case 8, Box 14, William North to Benjamin Walker, February 16, 1783.
[14] https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/secret-gay-history-hamilton-4th-july/
[15]Duponcaeu, "Notes and Documents:  The Autobiography of Peter Stephen Du Ponceau," Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol 63, (1939), 206-207.
[16] The Papers of General Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, Duponcaeu diary, Vol 1, No. 9. (microcfilm) Afterwords referred to as, Steuben Papers. 
[17]Kapp, Life of Steuben, 610.
[18]Duponcaeu, "Notes and Documents:  The Autobiography of Peter Stephen Du Ponceau," Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol 64, (1940), 264.
[19] Society of the Cincinnati Library, MSS1321MMB.
[20] John Adams to Charles Adams, 20th December, 1794. https://founders.archives.gov/?q=Baron%20Charles%20Adams&s=1111311113&r=163
[21]John Adams to Abigail Adams, 7 December 1794
[22] Steuben Papers, 7:224  (mircofilm).
[23] Steuben Papers, 5: 351,504. (mircofilm).
[25]Duponcaeu, "Notes and Documents:  The Autobiography of Peter Stephen Du Ponceau," Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol 63, (1939), 208.
[26] Ibid
[27] Michael Sonenscher, Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution, 58.
[28] Steuben's second and third will's are reproduced here: https://loyolanotredamelib.org/php/report05/articles/pdfs/Report35Pritchett19-26.pdf
[29] Steuben Papers, 7: 222. (mircofilm).